Mona Kareem on Blogging and Dissent in Kuwait

[Image of Mona Kareem.] [Image of Mona Kareem.]

Mona Kareem on Blogging and Dissent in Kuwait

By : Mona Kareem

[This post is part of an ongoing Profile of a Contemporary Conduit series on Jadaliyya that seeks to highlight distinct voices primarily in and from the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia.]

Jadaliyya (J): What motivated you to start blogging? 

Mona Kareem (MK): I blogged anonymously starting from 2006 about Kuwaiti politics and minorities in Kuwait. The uprisings motivated me to put my literary and journalistic writings together in a blog, considering the lack of scholarship and reporting on the Gulf region. The stateless minority in Kuwait that I come from did not have any access to media or public exposure, except through blogging and social media.

J: What topics/themes do you cover and why?

MK: I am mostly interested in the issues of minorities in the Gulf. I believe the struggle of those communities is even harder because of how much money Gulf regimes spend on media outlets and organizations to protect their image and further suppress any possibility for us to be heard. The stateless, or the Bidūn, exist in every Gulf country and are denied any right or documentation. Their struggle is against the dominant class and its culture. In Kuwait, the urban, rich class has been the biggest enemy of the tribal, stateless class. In other Gulf countries, the clash is constructed differently, but is of the same nature.

J: From your perspective, how does blogging fit into the wider scope of alternative media?

MK: Blogging has been an alternative source of writing in the Middle East since the war on Iraq. Everyone was looking for the other side of the story, the voice of the insider. Since then, a whole generation has been able to speak through blogging about their concerns – whether regarding politics in general or specific causes against inequality, censorship, etc. The value of blogging to me comes from its nature of being political and opinionated. Media everywhere chews on the discourse of neutrality when in reality, each of them follow a certain agenda. It is in blogging that we can see events narrated and discussed without pretending or claiming to hold ultimate truth in its content.

J: What obstacles have you faced writing about the Bidūn?

MK: It was a completely alien topic when the uprisings first started. Many times, I felt stuck explaining the very basic foundations of the issue and trying to analyze the irrational policies of the government for others. This has changed lately as the Bidūn continue to protest, use social media, and try to expose the oppression practiced against them. On a personal level, my family’s security is always at risk and my chance to have any documents renewed is poor. From experience, speaking about that in detail is also not a possibility, as it only brings more risks to those related to me.

J: How has the Kuwaiti government handled dissent within the past two years?

MK: Very badly. Many of us were hoping to see a more tolerant reaction from authorities, but the citizens and the stateless who continue to protest face intimidation in the region far too much. In 2011, the prime minister was changed and a change in the political system seemed very possible. Right after, the regime made a sudden turn and abused the system to push forward a puppet parliament and to prepare for changes in the constitution that would only lead to a more authoritarian system. This struggle resulted in having more than four hundred people on trial for political reasons since 2011, including protesters, Twitter users, and bloggers.

J: How do you respond to claims that Kuwait exemplifies the most “progressive” or “democratic” government system in the Gulf?

MK: This claim is outrageous, as it serves the interest of the authorities. The situation is only better comparatively. But can a regime be “democratic” and “progressive” because it is neighbored by a bloody dictatorship in Bahrain and a horrific theocracy in Saudi Arabia? Kuwait was ahead of the rest when it was open for all during the 60s and the 70s. Right now, it is just another oppressive Gulf emirate where free speech is violated normally, migrant workers are enslaved, the stateless are dehumanized, and women are only said to be equal because they got to vote in a parliament that has lost its meaning. 

[Mona Kareem tweets at @monakareem and blogs at Mona Kareem.]

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • البترومخيلة، الرواية واشتباك النفط

      البترومخيلة، الرواية واشتباك النفط

      لو أن لتجارة التوابل مثيلة في القرن العشرين، فإنها بلا شك صناعة النفط. في قيمتها الاقتصادية الاستراتيجية، ولكن أيضًا في قدرتها على تأجيج اشتباكات سياسية وعسكرية وثقافية بين شتى الأطراف، أصبح النفط السلعة الوحيدة التي قد ترادف البهار.

    • فادي جودة: قصائد مايو 2021

      فادي جودة: قصائد مايو 2021

      ما كنتَ وما
      عشته كُله
      قد أصابني مسبقًا.

    • في نقد النخبة الكويتية وخطاب التضامن

      في نقد النخبة الكويتية وخطاب التضامن

      في أبريل ٢٠١٣، قامت مجموعة من الليبراليات الكويتيات تحت اسم (مجموعة ٢٩) بتنظيم "المؤتمر الأول لعديمي الجنسية" ودُعي إليه مسؤولون كويتيون ومنظمات دولية لحقوق الإنسان، والحقيقة أنه كان المؤتمر الأول والأخير.

Ahmed Al Omran on Social Media and the Saudi Blogosphere

[This post is part of an ongoing Profile of a Contemporary Conduit series on Jadaliyya that seeks to highlight distinct voices primarily in and from the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia.] 

Jadaliyya (J): What do you think are the most gratifying aspects of Tweeting, and Twitter?

Ahmed Al Omran (AO): The most gratifying aspect of Twitter is probably the network. The people you meet and the access to a wide array of information and opinions that come through this network of people have become essential to my work and my life.

J: What are some of the political/social/cultural limits you’ve encountered using the platform? 

AO: Twitter’s limit of 140 characters per message, while it enforces brevity and spontaneity, does not allow for complex and well thought-out debate. There have been many, many cases in which I wished someone would take his/her time to flesh out the ideas they are firing on Twitter as longer, well-written blog posts that can be used later as a point of reference. Because Twitter is pretty much real-time and lacks a proper search engine, a lot of what is said there now seems to be fleeting bursts that get lost quickly.

J: In your experience and use of Twitter, do you feel it helps mobilize or disorganize? Focus or crowd? Is it manageable or noisy? Can it help persuade and mobilize or does it turn everyone into a voyeur and spectator?

AO: Twitter is a tool. It is what you make of it. It can be any of these things depending on how you use it. That being said, I wish there were more advanced tools to help power users better manage the amazing flow of information coming through the service. But Twitter seems to be more interested in growing its user base than helping power users to take more advantage of the service. At the same time, Twitter’s API restrictions mean third-party developers cannot develop such advanced tools.

J: Do you feel it has made a positive difference in how we disseminate and/or consume information? Are there any drawbacks for a wide-scale preoccupation with 140 characters?

AO: I think Twitter has made a positive difference when it comes to dissemination and distribution of information due to the simplicity of the service. I think this simplicity is what made Twitter become popular and gave it this great power as a vehicle for new information. Nowadays, news first break on Twitter. However, as I said earlier, this simplicity and 140-character limit mean that it is difficult to engage in discussion about complex topics.

J: In what ways has Twitter helped you as a source of information? How do you sift through that information and determine its credibility?

AO: Any time I’m working on my laptop, TweetDeck would be running in the left side of my screen showing tweets from the 2090 people I follow on Twitter. They provide me with a combination of news, interesting thoughts, and fun. These people have become sources of varying degrees of credibility. To determine this credibility, you look at the people who follow them and you assess their track record. That process happens over a long period of time, because even the best sources can get it wrong sometimes. The important thing is that when mistakes happen, people need to come forward and be transparent about them. 

J: How would you assess the level of activity in the Saudi blogosphere?

AO: Much of the conversation that used to take place in blogs now seem to be taking place on Twitter, which has become a major platform for Saudis to talk and debate their issues. The latest numbers show that there are 50 million tweets exchanged in Saudi Arabia per month. As more and more Saudis joined the site over the past year, the conversation there has become increasingly reflective of society and the public discourse in the country.

[Ahmed Al Omran blogs at Saudi Jeans and tweets at @ahmed.]